facebookresearch / facebookresearch/sam2
Sam1 is giving better results in comparision to Sam2
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 19.9k
- Forks
- 2.5k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
So I have had used sam1 and sam2 for image segmentation and compared their results.
The image segmentation done by sam1 is much better than sam2.
Result of sam1:
```
print(len(masks))
```
Output:
```
16
```

Result of sam2:
```
print(len(masks))
```
Output:
```
1
```

Please can anyone tell me why there is so much difference in the results from both the models. Also suggest me any possible points that I must take into consideration in order to improve the performance of my sam2 model.
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.