facebookresearch / facebookresearch/SteepGS
What is the performance of SteepGS when the number of primitives is close to original 3DGS?
Open
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 109
- Forks
- 10
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Congratulations on the great work and thanks for sharing it with the community!
I have a question regarding Table 1 of the paper. Specifically, I’m curious about the performance of SteepGS when the number of primitives is close to that of the original 3DGS—for example, around 3.339M on the Mip-NeRF 360 dataset. Could you share how SteepGS performs under such a setting?
Thank you in advance!
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.