facebookresearch / facebookresearch/NEST
Performance gap: 2-stage vs. Native kNN-LM
Open
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 12
- Forks
- 1
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi authors,
Regarding the Two-Stage k-NN Search (Section 3.1), I am curious if you have compared it with the native (single-stage) kNN-LM?
I would love to know the specific differences in:
1. Effectiveness: Does the 2-stage approximation cause a noticeable drop in perplexity?
2. Efficiency: How significant is the speed/latency gap between them?
Any qualitative analysis or quantitative results would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.