Is it safe to hold pointers to the node value of ConcurrentSkipList?
Open
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 30.5k
- Forks
- 5.9k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Will the ConcurrentSkipList nodes be re-allocated to other place at some point, which will make my pointer dangling (saved at calling `insert`)?
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.