ezyang / ezyang/logitext

Feature Request: Support for intuitionistic and classical Linear Logic

Open
#4 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
UrWeb
Stars
155
Forks
12
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

I continue to love this tool, and would love to see support for linear logic. I'm happy to set up the Coq side of this, at least.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by reviewing the existing logical inference visualizations and the proposed Coq setup, then define which intuitionistic and classical Linear Logic features must be supported and how completion will be verified.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
data-visualization
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.