expo / expo/eas-cli

Would you take a pull-request security scan workflow?

Open
#4,198 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
stale
Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
1.4k
Forks
236
Avg merge
3d 1h
Merged PRs (30d)
91

Description

Would a pull-request security scan be useful here, or is this already covered?

One workflow. On each pull request it scans the checked-out repository for
hardcoded credentials, injection, SSRF and unsafe deserialisation, and writes
findings to the Security tab. Report-only — findings never fail the build.

Two files under `.github/`, a pinned `@profullstack/threatcrush@0.11.1` whose tarball is hashed before
install, and `pull_request` rather than `pull_request_target`.

A pull request is open alongside this with the diff, if reading it is easier
than discussing it.

Disclosure: I maintain [ThreatCrush](https://github.com/profullstack/threatcrush);
MIT and free. Written with AI assistance. Closing this is a fine answer and I
will not ask again.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start by reading the open pull request diff and the two workflow files under `.github/`. Verify that the workflow runs on pull requests, uses the pinned and hashed ThreatCrush package with `pull_request`, and publishes report-only findings for credentials, injection, SSRF, and unsafe deserialization without failing the build.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
github-actions
Domain
ci-cd, security
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.