exercism / exercism/problem-specifications
`forth`: `evaluateBoth` property
Open
- Dominant language
- Ruby
- Stars
- 358
- Forks
- 563
- Avg merge
- 18h 41m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
In the `forth` specification there is a single test for the `evaluateBoth` property.
The remaining tests are for the `evaluate` property.
https://github.com/exercism/problem-specifications/blob/main/exercises/forth/canonical-data.json#L510
This confused the erlang test generator recently, as it assumes the `property` key points to the function under test.
Is this a missunderstanding on my side or do we need to find another way to specify a sequence of operations/function calls in the spec?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.