exercism / exercism/discussions

Track Maintenance: will journey-script-tests continue to work?

Open
#240 12 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
No language data
Stars
37
Forks
5
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

_Imported from https://github.com/exercism/-DEPRECATED-PLEASE-USE-exercism.io-REPO-v2-feedback/issues/64._
_Originally posted by @NobbZ._

#

From my userpoint of view, the process of retrieving has changed massively, I now do even need approval by a mentor.

But from a track-maintainers way, who uses a journey-script for testing the track, it worries me.

Those journey-scripts set up a mini-exercism on travis, which does only know about a single track. Also the CLI is used to fetch exercises from the mini-exercism.

This way of testing does not only ensure, that the tests and example solution do work, but also that all files are served correctly (not getting mangled because of symlink, or accidentaly match ignore pattern, etc).

Will such a script still be possible with nextercism CLI and API? I do not mind to change it a bit to make it suite the new CLI commands or because the mini-exercism has to be set up differently, I mean in general… Or do I need to go back to a script which simply walks the file tree and runs the test without pulling them?

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.