euroargodev / euroargodev/core_dmqc_bgcfloats

What QC if the first profiles are bad and the last ones look good?

Open
#1 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
No language data
Stars
0
Forks
0
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

In the attached file we show the OWC results and further analysis on the WMO 6903061 float. For the first 17 profiles the sensor did not work well, then it looks good. But is it true? Usually only the first two profiles show bad data due to different problems, not that much data. Has anyone seen this behavior before? What decision would you make?
[WMO 6903061.pdf](https://github.com/euroargodev/core_dmqc_bgcfloats/files/10082336/WMO.6903061.pdf)

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.