ethereum / ethereum/mpz

MPC Framework Wishlist

Open
#223 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
298
Forks
82
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Hey there! In [MPC Framework](https://github.com/voltrevo/mpc-framework) we currently primarily use [`emp-toolkit`](https://github.com/emp-toolkit/emp-agmpc) for a malicious secure backend. We're super interested in using `mpz` instead in the future, and we already have [`mpz-ts`](https://github.com/voltrevo/mpz-ts) utilizing an old version of mpz for not-malicious-secure garbling.

I'm not sure whether having a wishlist issue is compatible with your process, but please consider the following and feel free to split up/capture these in a way that makes more sense for you.

- [ ] Authenticated garbling
- [ ] N-party authenticated garbling
- [ ] wasm compatibility
- [ ] possibly avoid simd
- [ ] possibly avoid openssl (when porting emp-toolkit I had to replace it with mbedtls)
- [ ] option to not use threading (or figuring out why that was an issue in the past and possibly fixing it)
- [ ] Incremental/streaming preprocessing
- Doing this all upfront consumes a lot of memory. Much larger circuits should be possible if this can be done as-needed instead.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by reviewing the linked MPC Framework, emp-toolkit, and mpz-ts projects, then separate authenticated garbling, WASM compatibility, and streaming preprocessing into scoped tasks. Done requires agreed acceptance criteria for the selected capability.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust, wasm
Domain
cryptography
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.