ethereum-optimism / ethereum-optimism/specs

Jovian: Same deployer address

Open
#797 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Python
Stars
178
Forks
206
Avg merge
5d 2h
Merged PRs (30d)
6

Description

**Bug Description**

Seems like the deployer address for `L1BLock Deployment` and `GasPriceOracle Deployment` are the same in Jovian

https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/specs/blob/7c4cb3a2092d6618d4c6fd4c9c8909ea6288b596/specs/protocol/jovian/derivation.md?plain=1#L58

https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/specs/blob/7c4cb3a2092d6618d4c6fd4c9c8909ea6288b596/specs/protocol/jovian/derivation.md?plain=1#L143

Which means for `nonce=0` both would output the same address: `0x3Ba4007f5C922FBb33C454B41ea7a1f11E83df2C`

as per:
https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/specs/blob/7c4cb3a2092d6618d4c6fd4c9c8909ea6288b596/specs/protocol/jovian/derivation.md?plain=1#L72

https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/specs/blob/7c4cb3a2092d6618d4c6fd4c9c8909ea6288b596/specs/protocol/jovian/derivation.md?plain=1#L157

From looking at the Isthmus specs, I assume the last digit of a deployer address increases monotonically i.e. the correct deployer for `GasPriceOracle Deployment` in Jovian should be `0x4210000000000000000000000000000000000007`

Please correct me if I'm mistaken

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Compare the L1BLock Deployment and GasPriceOracle Deployment sections at lines 58 and 143 of specs/protocol/jovian/derivation.md, then check the nonce-based address derivation at lines 72 and 157. Use the Isthmus specs for comparison. Done means confirming whether the deployers collide and correcting the Jovian specification if the reported address is wrong.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
blockchain
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
42/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.