ethereum-optimism / ethereum-optimism/specs
Jovian: Same deployer address
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 178
- Forks
- 206
- Avg merge
- 5d 2h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 6
Description
**Bug Description**
Seems like the deployer address for `L1BLock Deployment` and `GasPriceOracle Deployment` are the same in Jovian
https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/specs/blob/7c4cb3a2092d6618d4c6fd4c9c8909ea6288b596/specs/protocol/jovian/derivation.md?plain=1#L58
https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/specs/blob/7c4cb3a2092d6618d4c6fd4c9c8909ea6288b596/specs/protocol/jovian/derivation.md?plain=1#L143
Which means for `nonce=0` both would output the same address: `0x3Ba4007f5C922FBb33C454B41ea7a1f11E83df2C`
as per:
https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/specs/blob/7c4cb3a2092d6618d4c6fd4c9c8909ea6288b596/specs/protocol/jovian/derivation.md?plain=1#L72
https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/specs/blob/7c4cb3a2092d6618d4c6fd4c9c8909ea6288b596/specs/protocol/jovian/derivation.md?plain=1#L157
From looking at the Isthmus specs, I assume the last digit of a deployer address increases monotonically i.e. the correct deployer for `GasPriceOracle Deployment` in Jovian should be `0x4210000000000000000000000000000000000007`
Please correct me if I'm mistaken
Contributor guide
Research direction
Compare the L1BLock Deployment and GasPriceOracle Deployment sections at lines 58 and 143 of specs/protocol/jovian/derivation.md, then check the nonce-based address derivation at lines 72 and 157. Use the Isthmus specs for comparison. Done means confirming whether the deployers collide and correcting the Jovian specification if the reported address is wrong.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- blockchain
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100