ethereum-optimism / ethereum-optimism/optimism
Improve reliability of transaction sending under various network conditions
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
proofs: ZK
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 6.5k
- Forks
- 4k
- Avg merge
- 2d 18h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 134
Description
Review revm’s L1Provider, which is used for eth_sendTransaction by the proposer and challenger, and assess whether it is as “reliable” as txmgr
This issue should also explicitly include improving the reliability of transaction sending code in new rust components like the kona-sp1-proposer
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing revm’s L1Provider and comparing its eth_sendTransaction behavior with txmgr under various network conditions. Then inspect the transaction-sending code in the kona-sp1-proposer. Done means the proposer, challenger, and new Rust components have transaction-sending reliability comparable to txmgr.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go, rust
- Domain
- blockchain, networking
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100