eclipse-jdt / eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core
Tolerate missing types in more positions?
Open
compiler
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 237
- Forks
- 195
- Avg merge
- 1d 10h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 49
Description
In #2543 I focused on methods as a reason for undesired lookup of a missing type.
Perhaps a similar story could also unfold for fields?
Also parameters of any super types may refer to missing types which possibly (?) can be ignored in some cases?
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.