easystats / easystats/performance
Cannot check model from mgcv and categorical outcome
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 1.2k
- Forks
- 109
- Avg merge
- 6h 34m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 8
Description
Reproducible example:
library(mgcv)
library(performance)
df <- mtcars |>
tibble::as_tibble() |>
dplyr::mutate(carb = as.integer(carb))
model <- mgcv::gam(
carb~s(wt, k=5),
data = df,
family = mgcv::ocat(R=8)
)
plot(check_model(model))
Error:
Error in d[, !(names(data) %in% all.varying), drop = FALSE] :
incorrect number of dimensions
It seems that there is something wrong when using mgcv and ocat. Nevertheless, I can use MASS and ordinal regression:
df <- mtcars |>
tibble::as_tibble() |>
dplyr::mutate(carb = as.factor(carb))
model <- MASS::polr(
carb~wt,
data = df,
Hess = TRUE
)
plot(check_model(model))
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by running the reproducible mgcv::gam example with performance::check_model() and inspect the handling of categorical outcomes from mgcv::ocat models. Done means check_model(model) completes without the dimensionality error and produces the diagnostic plot shown in the report.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- r
- Domain
- testing-qa
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100