easystats / easystats/performance

`check_predictions` not working for `nlme::lme()`

Open
#499 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

3 investigators :grey_question::question:
Dominant language
R
Stars
1.2k
Forks
109
Avg merge
6h 34m
Merged PRs (30d)
8

Description

library(nlme)

fm2 <- lme(Reaction ~ Days,
           random = ~ Days | Subject,
           data = lme4::sleepstudy)

performance::check_model(fm2)
#> Could not compute standard errors from random effects for diagnostic
#>   plot.
#> Homogeneity of variance could not be computed. Cannot extract residual
#>   variance from objects of class 'lme'.
#> Converting missing values (`NA`) into regular values currently not
#>   possible for variables of class `NULL`.
#> Error in d[, !(names(data) %in% all.varying), drop = FALSE]: incorrect number of dimensions

Created on 2022-10-23 by the reprex package (v2.0.1)

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by running the supplied nlme::lme example and tracing performance::check_model through its prediction and diagnostic paths. Use the reported errors to identify where lme objects are unsupported, then verify that the example completes and produces the expected diagnostics without errors.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
r
Domain
data
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.