easystats / easystats/performance
Compatibility with {rethinking} models
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Enhancement :boom:
Low priority :sleeping:
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 1.2k
- Forks
- 109
- Avg merge
- 6h 34m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 8
Description
Hi!
Would it be possible to make your package compatible with {rethinking} models? Especially ulam, which is built on top of STAN. {tidybayes} package did the same, so it might be useful resource.
For example, this throws an error:
d <- list(x = dnorm(100))
m <- rethinking::ulam(
alist(
x ~ dnorm(mu, 1),
mu ~ dnorm(0, 1)
), data = d
)
performance::check_model(m)
Thank you in advance.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the compatibility path exercised by performance::check_model(m) for the rethinking::ulam example, and consult the linked tidybayes.rethinking package as a reference. Done means the supplied ulam model no longer throws an error when checked.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- r
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100