easystats / easystats/modelbased
Vignette for comparison with alterative solutions
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 263
- Forks
- 22
- Avg merge
- 1h 22m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 11
Description
@IndrajeetPatil @bwiernik since you're arguably the most knowledgeable of other alternatives; what say you about creating a vignette to compare modelbased to other alternatives (broom::augment; tidymodels; ggeffects; raw emmeans; base R; ...) with the threefold goal of 1) showing how to do something with other packages; 2) eventually help users transitioning; 3) get an overview of areas of improvement where modelbased lacks some features or is more complicated to use?
Could you throw at me some examples of problems that you actually had to address with them / features that you use / things that you like with alternatives, so that I can come up with the modelbased alternative and put it all in a vignette? Also pinging @strengejacke @mattansb for ggeffects
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the proposed comparison vignette scope and the alternatives named in the issue: broom::augment, tidymodels, ggeffects, raw emmeans, and base R. Gather concrete examples of problems or features to compare, then define the vignette's coverage and verify that it explains equivalent workflows and areas where modelbased differs or lacks features.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- r
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100