easystats / easystats/effectsize
Improve CI coverage for non-parametric CLES and rank differences
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Discussion 🦜
enhancement 🔥
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 353
- Forks
- 25
- Avg merge
- 9h 21m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Open a new issue / pr to discuss improving the CI covered for all of these methods - since they are all monotonic transformations of one another, it makes sense to me they can be improved together.
Originally posted by @mattansb in https://github.com/easystats/effectsize/issues/496#issuecomment-1256971597
Also related to #479
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the discussion in issue #496 and the related issue #479, then identify the CI coverage for the non-parametric CLES and rank-difference methods. Done means CI coverage is improved across all of the related monotonic methods.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- r
- Domain
- testing-qa
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100