eWaterCycle / eWaterCycle/ewatercycle-forecast

Precipitation forcing uses non-conservative remapping

Open
#37 2 comments 0 reactions 3 assignees Claimed by @rvanharen View on GitHub
Dominant language
Shell
Stars
2
Forks
3
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Precipitation fluxes of the forcing are remapped using bilinear interpolation. It probably doesn't make too much of a difference, but I think we should use a conservative remapping technique here. CDO (which we already use for the remapping) supports both 1st order and 2nd order conservative remapping.

Pre-processing script is at https://github.com/eWaterCycle/ewatercycle/blob/master/cylc-suites/forecast/bin/preprocess_ensemble_forcing.sh

More details about conservative remapping at:
https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127%3C2204:FASOCR%3E2.0.CO;2

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.