eWaterCycle / eWaterCycle/Review-Of-Software-Publication-Checklist
Consider github.io as option for docs publication in check 10
Open
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Github.io maintains documentation within the same github repository, gives the user freedom in styling and prevents annoying ads in the docs. I would rather mention github.io or mention it side-by-side with readthedocs.io.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Locate check 10 in the checklist and review how readthedocs.io is currently presented. Done means the wording mentions github.io either as an alternative or alongside readthedocs.io, as requested.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- github
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100