Research Designer-safe service assignment and UI scope ownership
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 4.9k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- Avg merge
- 20h 23m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 103
Description
## Objective
Validate whether a marker/assignment contract, generated hookup code, activation factory, or another pattern best bridges parameterless Designer creation and runtime DI. Include Forms, UserControls, components, inherited forms, nested controls, modal dialogs, and out-of-process Designer constraints. Define scope ownership and disposal rules.
## Completion guidance
- Keep the implementation focused on the objective while allowing the assignee to improve the approach based on research.
- Document important decisions, rejected alternatives, dependencies, and follow-up work.
- Add or update tests and documentation appropriate to the work.
- Verify locally and in CI where the task changes code or generated artifacts.
Contributor guide
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by researching the Designer/runtime DI boundary across Forms, UserControls, components, inherited forms, nested controls, modal dialogs, and out-of-process Designer constraints; done means documented decisions, rejected alternatives, scope and disposal rules, appropriate tests and documentation, and local/CI verification.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- csharp
- Domain
- desktop
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100