dotnet new record has no switch for "just" record

### Description

Apologies if it's more of a feature request than an issue.
I tried using `dot net new record` and it created a `record class` with `public record class ` instead of `public record` and I could not find a switch for "just" `public record` there to match other `record` items in my project.
I am aware we can have custom templates, but a `--short` to shorthand would've been nice.
Thanks.

### Reproduction Steps

Follow these steps, I used PowerShell 7.6 for this:

```powershell
dotnet new update
cd /
mkdir record-test
cd .\record-test\
dotnet new classlib -n MyClassLib
cd .\MyClassLib\
dotnet new record -n MyAwesomeRecord
cat .\MyAwesomeRecord.cs

```

### Expected behavior

Output should have been:

```csharp
namespace MyClassLib;

public record MyAwesomeRecord
{

}
```

### Actual behavior

Output will be:

```csharp
namespace MyClassLib;

public record class MyAwesomeRecord
{

}
```

### Regression?

Not a regression, just missing a switch IMHO.
Thanks.

### Known Workarounds

A custom template?

### Configuration

```powershell
dotnet --info
.NET SDK:
Version: 10.0.301
Commit: 96856fd726
Workload version: 10.0.300-manifests.8c7d7c03
MSBuild version: 18.6.4+96856fd72

Runtime Environment:
OS Name: Windows
OS Version: 10.0.26200
OS Platform: Windows
RID: win-x64
Base Path: C:\Program Files\dotnet\sdk\10.0.301\
```

### Other information

Please change to feature request / new feature etc. if not an issue.
Thanks.

Start by reproducing the issue with the documented `dotnet new record -n MyAwesomeRecord` command and compare its output with the requested `public record` form. Trace the `dotnet new record` template entry point and determine how a switch such as `--short` should affect generated output; done means the switch produces the requested form without changing the existing default.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.