[ci-scan] Known Build Error: profiler/gcheapenumeration fails in gc-standalone
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 18.3k
- Forks
- 5.6k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
## Build Information
Build: https://dev.azure.com/dnceng-public/public/_build/results?buildId=1414855
Build error leg or test failing: coreclr windows x64 Checked gcstandaloneserver-profiler/gcheapenumeration/gcheapenumeration/gcheapenumeration.cmd
## Error Message
```json
{
"ErrorMessage": "GCHeapEnumerationProfiler::Shutdown: FAIL: Expected at least 90 objects, got 0",
"BuildRetry": false,
"ExcludeConsoleLog": false
}
```
Tracking: dotnet/runtime#127669
**Failure details:**
```
GCHeapEnumerationProfiler::Shutdown: FAIL: Expected at least 90 objects, got 0
GCHeapEnumerationProfiler::Shutdown: FAIL: Expected 1 custom GCHeapObject type, got 0
Test failed: Profiler tests are expected to contain the text 'PROFILER TEST PASSES'
System.Exception: Profiler tests are expected to contain the text 'PROFILER TEST PASSES'
at Profiler.Tests.ProfilerTestRunner.FailFastWithMessage(String error)
at Profiler.Tests.ProfilerTestRunner.Run(...)
at Profiler.Tests.GCHeapEnumerationTests.RunProfilerTest(...)
```
**Affected legs (gcstandaloneserver only):**
- coreclr linux arm64 Checked gcstandaloneserver
- coreclr linux x64 Checked gcstandaloneserver
- coreclr windows arm64 Checked gcstandaloneserver
- coreclr windows x64 Checked gcstandaloneserver
**Console Log:** https://helix.dot.net/api/2019-06-17/jobs/01274b42-8e5c-4512-b0a7-6bd83e35a883/workitems/profiler/console
**First build in window:** [gc-standalone 20260430.1](https://dev.azure.com/dnceng-public/public/_build/results?buildId=1403687) (2026-04-30). Consistently failing in all subsequent builds within the scanned window. This is within the scanned window and may not be the true origin.
> [!NOTE]
>
> 🔒 Integrity filter blocked 6 items
>
> The following items were blocked because they don't meet the GitHub integrity level.
>
> - [#114222](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/114222) `search_issues`: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".
> - [#110173](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/110173) `search_issues`: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".
> - [#84911](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/84911) `search_issues`: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".
> - [#125825](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/125825) `search_issues`: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".
> - [#92423](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/92423) `search_issues`: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".
> - [#85535](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/85535) `search_issues`: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".
>
> To allow these resources, lower `min-integrity` in your GitHub frontmatter:
>
> ```yaml
> tools:
> github:
> min-integrity: approved # merged | approved | unapproved | none
> ```
>
>
> Generated by [CI Outer-Loop Failure Scanner](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/25736850759/agentic_workflow) · ● 52.8M · [◷](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Adotnet%2Fruntime+is%3Aissue+%22gh-aw-workflow-call-id%3A+dotnet%2Fruntime%2Fci-failure-scan%22&type=issues)
### Report
|Build|Definition|Test|Pull Request|
|---|---|---|---|
|[1414855](https://dev.azure.com/dnceng-public/public/_build/results?buildId=1414855)|dotnet/runtime|[profiler/gcheapenumeration/gcheapenumeration/gcheapenumeration.cmd](https://dev.azure.com/dnceng-public/public/_build/results?buildId=1414855&view=ms.vss-test-web.build-test-results-tab&runId=39360870&resultId=102819)||
#### Summary
|24-Hour Hit Count|7-Day Hit Count|1-Month Count|
|---|---|---|
|0|1|1|
### Report
#### Summary
|24-Hour Hit Count|7-Day Hit Count|1-Month Count|
|---|---|---|
|0|0|0|
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.