No IntelliSense in lambda body of ternary consequent expression when ternary alternative expression is missing or invalid
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 20.7k
- Forks
- 4.3k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
**Full issue information + repro project**:
https://github.com/just-ero/roslyn-issues-repros/tree/main/5.0.0/005_NoIntelliSense_FuncTernary
### Version
> [!NOTE]
> **Roslyn**: 5.0.0-1.25361.2 (fdd628a8)
> **.NET SDK**: 10.0.100-preview.6.25358.103
>
> **Visual Studio Code**: 1.102.1
> **C# Extension**: 2.86.19
> **C# Dev Kit Extension**: 1.40.25
### Steps to Reproduce
1. Add the following code wherever syntactically applicable:
```cs
void M()
{
Func f = true
? (i => i.ToString())
: (i => );
}
```
Note: Any invalid alternative expression results in the behavior.
2. Hover over `i.ToString()` to see no IntelliSense.
### Expected Behavior
The consequent expression is correctly recognized, IntelliSense is offered, and code has semantic highlighting.
### Actual Behavior
It does not.
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.