dotnet / dotnet/perf-autofiling-issues
[Perf] Windows/x64: 2 Improvements on 9/11/2026 9:18:24 AM +00:00
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 10
- Forks
- 8
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
### Run Information
Name | Value
-- | --
Architecture | x64
OS | Windows 10.0.22631
Queue | ViperWindows
Baseline | [f8a811758057986566da27d06d8f03a7e5e226bf](https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/commit/f8a811758057986566da27d06d8f03a7e5e226bf)
Compare | [c9b72963eb22ce3f8eb2ad8ebedf9ecef57615da](https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/commit/c9b72963eb22ce3f8eb2ad8ebedf9ecef57615da)
Diff | [Diff](https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/compare/f8a811758057986566da27d06d8f03a7e5e226bf...c9b72963eb22ce3f8eb2ad8ebedf9ecef57615da)
Configs | CompilationMode:tiered, RunKind:bepuphysics
### Improvements in DemoBenchmarks.GatherScatterBenchmarks
Benchmark | Baseline | Test | Test/Base | Test Quality | Edge Detector | Baseline IR | Compare IR | IR Ratio
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
|
- [GatherState - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
![graph]()
[Test Report]()
### Repro
General Docs link: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/main/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md
```cmd
git clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
py .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net8.0 --filter 'DemoBenchmarks.GatherScatterBenchmarks*'
```
### DemoBenchmarks.GatherScatterBenchmarks.GatherState
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### Docs
[Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/profiling-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
[Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
---
### Run Information
Name | Value
-- | --
Architecture | x64
OS | Windows 10.0.22631
Queue | ViperWindows
Baseline | [f8a811758057986566da27d06d8f03a7e5e226bf](https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/commit/f8a811758057986566da27d06d8f03a7e5e226bf)
Compare | [c9b72963eb22ce3f8eb2ad8ebedf9ecef57615da](https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/commit/c9b72963eb22ce3f8eb2ad8ebedf9ecef57615da)
Diff | [Diff](https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/compare/f8a811758057986566da27d06d8f03a7e5e226bf...c9b72963eb22ce3f8eb2ad8ebedf9ecef57615da)
Configs | CompilationMode:tiered, RunKind:bepuphysics
### Improvements in DemoBenchmarks.TwoBodyConstraintBenchmarks
Benchmark | Baseline | Test | Test/Base | Test Quality | Edge Detector | Baseline IR | Compare IR | IR Ratio
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
|
- [Contact4Nonconvex - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
![graph]()
[Test Report]()
### Repro
General Docs link: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/main/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md
```cmd
git clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
py .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net8.0 --filter 'DemoBenchmarks.TwoBodyConstraintBenchmarks*'
```
### DemoBenchmarks.TwoBodyConstraintBenchmarks.Contact4Nonconvex
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### Docs
[Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/profiling-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
[Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start with src/benchmarks/real-world/bepuphysics2/GatherScatterBenchmarks.cs and TwoBodyConstraintBenchmarks.cs, then run the two provided benchmarks with benchmarks_ci.py. Compare the Windows x64 results and linked test reports to determine whether the improvements are reproducible and what change, if any, is expected; the issue is done when the findings are triaged or an actionable follow-up is identified.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- csharp, python
- Domain
- performance
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100