dotnet / dotnet/perf-autofiling-issues
[Perf] Linux/x64: 4 Regressions on 8/4/2026 1:32:21 PM +00:00
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 10
- Forks
- 8
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
### Run Information
Name | Value
-- | --
Architecture | x64
OS | ubuntu 22.04
Queue | ViperUbuntu
Baseline | [813f634ceb016018f5acc9bd3c2b16e17dff4686](https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/commit/813f634ceb016018f5acc9bd3c2b16e17dff4686)
Compare | [5da2de22f7c6e2ebe7ed4c16c614b00183145d3c](https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/commit/5da2de22f7c6e2ebe7ed4c16c614b00183145d3c)
Diff | [Diff](https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/compare/813f634ceb016018f5acc9bd3c2b16e17dff4686...5da2de22f7c6e2ebe7ed4c16c614b00183145d3c)
Configs | CompilationMode:tiered, RunKind:imagesharp
### Regressions in SixLabors.ImageSharp.Benchmarks.Codecs.DecodeFilteredPng
Benchmark | Baseline | Test | Test/Base | Test Quality | Edge Detector | Baseline IR | Compare IR | IR Ratio
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
|
- [PngFilter0 - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
|
- [PngFilter2 - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
|
- [PngFilter1 - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
|
- [PngFilter3 - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
![graph]()
![graph]()
![graph]()
![graph]()
[Test Report]()
### Repro
General Docs link: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/main/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md
```cmd
git clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
python3 .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net8.0 --filter 'SixLabors.ImageSharp.Benchmarks.Codecs.DecodeFilteredPng*'
```
### SixLabors.ImageSharp.Benchmarks.Codecs.DecodeFilteredPng.PngFilter0
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### SixLabors.ImageSharp.Benchmarks.Codecs.DecodeFilteredPng.PngFilter2
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### SixLabors.ImageSharp.Benchmarks.Codecs.DecodeFilteredPng.PngFilter1
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### SixLabors.ImageSharp.Benchmarks.Codecs.DecodeFilteredPng.PngFilter3
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### Docs
[Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/profiling-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
[Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start with src/benchmarks/real-world/ImageSharp/Codecs/DecodeFilteredPng.cs and the reported baseline and comparison commits. Run scripts/benchmarks_ci.py with the DecodeFilteredPng filter, compare the four reported results, and use the linked reports to identify the regression. Done means the four PNG filter benchmarks no longer regress and the results are verified.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- linux, python, ubuntu
- Domain
- performance
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100