dotnet / dotnet/perf-autofiling-issues
[Perf] Linux/x64: 2 Regressions on 8/4/2026 1:29:49 PM +00:00
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 10
- Forks
- 8
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
### Run Information
Name | Value
-- | --
Architecture | x64
OS | ubuntu 22.04
Queue | ViperUbuntu
Baseline | [813f634ceb016018f5acc9bd3c2b16e17dff4686](https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/commit/813f634ceb016018f5acc9bd3c2b16e17dff4686)
Compare | [5da2de22f7c6e2ebe7ed4c16c614b00183145d3c](https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/commit/5da2de22f7c6e2ebe7ed4c16c614b00183145d3c)
Diff | [Diff](https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/compare/813f634ceb016018f5acc9bd3c2b16e17dff4686...5da2de22f7c6e2ebe7ed4c16c614b00183145d3c)
Configs | CompilationMode:tiered, RunKind:bepuphysics
### Regressions in DemoBenchmarks.SweepBenchmarks
Benchmark | Baseline | Test | Test/Base | Test Quality | Edge Detector | Baseline IR | Compare IR | IR Ratio
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
|
- [CapsuleCylinder - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
![graph]()
[Test Report]()
### Repro
General Docs link: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/main/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md
```cmd
git clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
python3 .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net8.0 --filter 'DemoBenchmarks.SweepBenchmarks*'
```
### DemoBenchmarks.SweepBenchmarks.CapsuleCylinder
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### Docs
[Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/profiling-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
[Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
---
### Run Information
Name | Value
-- | --
Architecture | x64
OS | ubuntu 22.04
Queue | ViperUbuntu
Baseline | [813f634ceb016018f5acc9bd3c2b16e17dff4686](https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/commit/813f634ceb016018f5acc9bd3c2b16e17dff4686)
Compare | [5da2de22f7c6e2ebe7ed4c16c614b00183145d3c](https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/commit/5da2de22f7c6e2ebe7ed4c16c614b00183145d3c)
Diff | [Diff](https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/compare/813f634ceb016018f5acc9bd3c2b16e17dff4686...5da2de22f7c6e2ebe7ed4c16c614b00183145d3c)
Configs | CompilationMode:tiered, RunKind:bepuphysics
### Regressions in DemoBenchmarks.TwoBodyConstraintBenchmarks
Benchmark | Baseline | Test | Test/Base | Test Quality | Edge Detector | Baseline IR | Compare IR | IR Ratio
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
|
- [BallSocket - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
![graph]()
[Test Report]()
### Repro
General Docs link: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/main/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md
```cmd
git clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
python3 .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net8.0 --filter 'DemoBenchmarks.TwoBodyConstraintBenchmarks*'
```
### DemoBenchmarks.TwoBodyConstraintBenchmarks.BallSocket
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### Docs
[Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/profiling-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
[Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start with src/benchmarks/real-world/bepuphysics2/SweepBenchmarks.cs and TwoBodyConstraintBenchmarks.cs at the linked benchmark lines, then run the listed benchmarks_ci.py commands. Compare the baseline and test commits using the linked reports and profiling workflow docs. Done means explaining the CapsuleCylinder and BallSocket regressions and documenting the resulting diagnosis or fix.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- csharp, linux, python, ubuntu
- Domain
- operating-systems, performance, testing-qa
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100