dotnet / dotnet/perf-autofiling-issues
[Perf] Linux/arm64: 9 Improvements on 7/21/2026 3:12:56 AM +00:00
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 10
- Forks
- 8
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
### Run Information
Name | Value
-- | --
Architecture | arm64
OS | azurelinux 3.0
Queue | CobaltAzureLinux
Baseline | [73a9e0a51ed85481b7f03ca3f2696e020365afd6](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/commit/73a9e0a51ed85481b7f03ca3f2696e020365afd6)
Compare | [7e3626903d758fab196fa09782a7e198a985bf36](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/commit/7e3626903d758fab196fa09782a7e198a985bf36)
Diff | [Diff](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/compare/73a9e0a51ed85481b7f03ca3f2696e020365afd6...7e3626903d758fab196fa09782a7e198a985bf36)
Configs | CompilationMode:tiered, R2RType:r2r_interpreter, RunKind:micro
### Improvements in Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Performance.PipeThroughputBenchmark
Benchmark | Baseline | Test | Test/Base | Test Quality | Edge Detector | Baseline IR | Compare IR | IR Ratio
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
|
- [Parse_ParallelAsync - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
|
- [Parse_ParallelAsync - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
|
- [Parse_ParallelAsync - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
|
- [Parse_SequentialAsync - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
|
- [Parse_SequentialAsync - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
|
- [Parse_ParallelAsync - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
|
- [Parse_SequentialAsync - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
|
- [Parse_SequentialAsync - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
![graph]()
![graph]()
![graph]()
![graph]()
![graph]()
![graph]()
![graph]()
![graph]()
[Test Report]()
### Repro
General Docs link: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/main/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md
```cmd
git clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
py .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net8.0 --filter 'Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Performance.PipeThroughputBenchmark*'
```
### Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Performance.PipeThroughputBenchmark.Parse_ParallelAsync(Length: 128, Chunks: 16)
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Performance.PipeThroughputBenchmark.Parse_ParallelAsync(Length: 128, Chunks: 1)
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Performance.PipeThroughputBenchmark.Parse_ParallelAsync(Length: 4096, Chunks: 16)
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Performance.PipeThroughputBenchmark.Parse_SequentialAsync(Length: 128, Chunks: 16)
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Performance.PipeThroughputBenchmark.Parse_SequentialAsync(Length: 4096, Chunks: 16)
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Performance.PipeThroughputBenchmark.Parse_ParallelAsync(Length: 4096, Chunks: 1)
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Performance.PipeThroughputBenchmark.Parse_SequentialAsync(Length: 4096, Chunks: 1)
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Performance.PipeThroughputBenchmark.Parse_SequentialAsync(Length: 128, Chunks: 1)
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### Docs
[Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/profiling-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
[Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
---
### Run Information
Name | Value
-- | --
Architecture | arm64
OS | azurelinux 3.0
Queue | CobaltAzureLinux
Baseline | [73a9e0a51ed85481b7f03ca3f2696e020365afd6](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/commit/73a9e0a51ed85481b7f03ca3f2696e020365afd6)
Compare | [7e3626903d758fab196fa09782a7e198a985bf36](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/commit/7e3626903d758fab196fa09782a7e198a985bf36)
Diff | [Diff](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/compare/73a9e0a51ed85481b7f03ca3f2696e020365afd6...7e3626903d758fab196fa09782a7e198a985bf36)
Configs | CompilationMode:tiered, R2RType:r2r_interpreter, RunKind:micro
### Improvements in System.IO.Pipelines.Tests.Perf_Pipe
Benchmark | Baseline | Test | Test/Base | Test Quality | Edge Detector | Baseline IR | Compare IR | IR Ratio
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
|
- [SyncReadAsync - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
![graph]()
[Test Report]()
### Repro
General Docs link: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/main/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md
```cmd
git clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
py .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net8.0 --filter 'System.IO.Pipelines.Tests.Perf_Pipe*'
```
### System.IO.Pipelines.Tests.Perf_Pipe.SyncReadAsync
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### Docs
[Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/profiling-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
[Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start with the linked PipeThroughputBenchmark.cs sections at lines 49-56 and 86-105, then inspect the baseline and comparison commits and benchmark reports for the arm64 AzureLinux run. The issue does not identify a failing test, suspected change, or requested fix, so completion requires triage to define an actionable performance problem and its validation criteria.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- azure, linux
- Domain
- backend, performance
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100