dotnet / dotnet/perf-autofiling-issues

[Perf] Linux/x64: 2 Regressions on 6/25/2026 3:50:04 PM +00:00

Open
#75,841 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
arch-wasm arch-x64 branch-refs/heads/main compilationmode-wasm kind-micro Look Again os-linux perf-regression runkind-micro runtimetype-coreclr untriaged
Dominant language
No language data
Stars
10
Forks
8
PR merge metrics
PR metrics pending

Description

### Run Information

Name | Value
-- | --
Architecture | x64
OS | ubuntu 22.04
Queue | ViperUbuntu
Baseline | [818cfd5edcda78ac3eb201af392fd301ab9ad46b](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/commit/818cfd5edcda78ac3eb201af392fd301ab9ad46b)
Compare | [4e28c96c3bd32ce2811ef7128641e8926874020e](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/commit/4e28c96c3bd32ce2811ef7128641e8926874020e)
Diff | [Diff](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/compare/818cfd5edcda78ac3eb201af392fd301ab9ad46b...4e28c96c3bd32ce2811ef7128641e8926874020e)
Configs | CompilationMode:wasm, RunKind:micro, RuntimeType:coreclr

### Regressions in Burgers

Benchmark | Baseline | Test | Test/Base | Test Quality | Edge Detector | Baseline IR | Compare IR | IR Ratio
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
|

  • [Test2 - Duration of single invocation]()
  • 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
  • [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
| 11.17 secs | 19.65 secs | 1.76 | 0.34 | False | | |

![graph]()
[Test Report]()

### Repro
General Docs link: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/main/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md

```cmd
git clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
python3 .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net8.0 --filter 'Burgers*'
```

### Burgers.Test2

#### ETL Files

#### Histogram

#### JIT Disasms

### Docs

[Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/profiling-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
[Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)

---

### Run Information

Name | Value
-- | --
Architecture | x64
OS | ubuntu 22.04
Queue | ViperUbuntu
Baseline | [818cfd5edcda78ac3eb201af392fd301ab9ad46b](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/commit/818cfd5edcda78ac3eb201af392fd301ab9ad46b)
Compare | [4e28c96c3bd32ce2811ef7128641e8926874020e](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/commit/4e28c96c3bd32ce2811ef7128641e8926874020e)
Diff | [Diff](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/compare/818cfd5edcda78ac3eb201af392fd301ab9ad46b...4e28c96c3bd32ce2811ef7128641e8926874020e)
Configs | CompilationMode:wasm, RunKind:micro, RuntimeType:coreclr

### Regressions in System.Memory.Span<Int32>

Benchmark | Baseline | Test | Test/Base | Test Quality | Edge Detector | Baseline IR | Compare IR | IR Ratio
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
|

  • [Clear - Duration of single invocation]()
  • 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
  • [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
| 464.38 ns | 557.51 ns | 1.20 | 0.21 | False | | |

![graph]()
[Test Report]()

### Repro
General Docs link: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/main/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md

```cmd
git clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
python3 .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net8.0 --filter 'System.Memory.Span*'
```

### System.Memory.Span<Int32>.Clear(Size: 3000)

#### ETL Files

#### Histogram

#### JIT Disasms

### Docs

[Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/profiling-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
[Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

Start with the benchmark sources Burgers.cs lines 191-192 and Span.cs lines 41-42, then run the listed benchmarks from the dotnet/performance repository. Compare the baseline and compare commits using the benchmarking and profiling workflow docs; done means both reported regressions are reproduced or explained and the findings are documented.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
linux, python, wasm
Domain
performance, testing
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
45/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.