dotnet / dotnet/perf-autofiling-issues
[Perf] Windows/x86: 2 Regressions on 6/24/2026 11:48:31 AM +00:00
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 10
- Forks
- 8
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
### Run Information
Name | Value
-- | --
Architecture | x86
OS | Windows 10.0.22631
Queue | ViperWindows
Baseline | [0d1a20fb14109f277df06ebee3f83c964f9dcc61](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/commit/0d1a20fb14109f277df06ebee3f83c964f9dcc61)
Compare | [9c1fdaea7e4595785db31a5a219f66fb7d2a4ec1](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/commit/9c1fdaea7e4595785db31a5a219f66fb7d2a4ec1)
Diff | [Diff](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/compare/0d1a20fb14109f277df06ebee3f83c964f9dcc61...9c1fdaea7e4595785db31a5a219f66fb7d2a4ec1)
Configs | CompilationMode:tiered, RunKind:micro
### Regressions in System.Net.Sockets.Tests.SocketSendReceivePerfTest
Benchmark | Baseline | Test | Test/Base | Test Quality | Edge Detector | Baseline IR | Compare IR | IR Ratio
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
|
- [ReceiveAsyncThenSendAsync_SocketAsyncEventArgs - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
![graph]()
[Test Report]()
### Repro
General Docs link: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/main/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md
```cmd
git clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
py .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net8.0 --filter 'System.Net.Sockets.Tests.SocketSendReceivePerfTest*'
```
### System.Net.Sockets.Tests.SocketSendReceivePerfTest.ReceiveAsyncThenSendAsync_SocketAsyncEventArgs
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### Docs
[Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/profiling-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
[Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
---
### Run Information
Name | Value
-- | --
Architecture | x86
OS | Windows 10.0.22631
Queue | ViperWindows
Baseline | [0d1a20fb14109f277df06ebee3f83c964f9dcc61](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/commit/0d1a20fb14109f277df06ebee3f83c964f9dcc61)
Compare | [9c1fdaea7e4595785db31a5a219f66fb7d2a4ec1](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/commit/9c1fdaea7e4595785db31a5a219f66fb7d2a4ec1)
Diff | [Diff](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/compare/0d1a20fb14109f277df06ebee3f83c964f9dcc61...9c1fdaea7e4595785db31a5a219f66fb7d2a4ec1)
Configs | CompilationMode:tiered, RunKind:micro
### Regressions in System.Collections.IterateForEach<Int32>
Benchmark | Baseline | Test | Test/Base | Test Quality | Edge Detector | Baseline IR | Compare IR | IR Ratio
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
|
- [HashSet - Duration of single invocation]()
- 📝 - [Benchmark Source]()
- [ADX - Test Multi Config Graph]()
![graph]()
[Test Report]()
### Repro
General Docs link: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/main/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md
```cmd
git clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
py .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net8.0 --filter 'System.Collections.IterateForEach*'
```
### System.Collections.IterateForEach<Int32>.HashSet(Size: 512)
#### ETL Files
#### Histogram
#### JIT Disasms
### Docs
[Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/profiling-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
[Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository](https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/master/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start with the listed benchmark sources: src/benchmarks/micro/libraries/System.Net.Sockets/Perf.Socket.cs and src/benchmarks/micro/libraries/System.Collections/Iterate/IterateForEach.cs. Run the two provided benchmarks using benchmarks_ci.py, then compare results with the linked regression reports and baseline/compare commits. Done means the regressions are explained and the affected benchmark returns to an acceptable performance level.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- performance, testing
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100