Dependency diagram (fig 7.7) confusing
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 4.8k
- Forks
- 6.1k
- Avg merge
- 19h 10m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 268
Description
Fig 7.7 would benefit from using some UML notation for how the dependencies are implemented. The current diagram, at first glace, seems to indicate that the Application layer would have a dependency on the Infrastructure layer. There is indeed a relationship between the 2 layer; however, this should be indicated as an inversion of control where the Infrastructure layer implements an interface and injects the implementation. UML provides a connector standard that most developer should know to understand the type of relationship.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 95f3dcd7-3220-e9cf-3ca6-90b1282410ec
* Version Independent ID: 5a30bea5-326b-ea72-59ae-dfef1e190e4a
* Content: [Designing a DDD-oriented microservice](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/architecture/microservices/microservice-ddd-cqrs-patterns/ddd-oriented-microservice)
* Content Source: [docs/architecture/microservices/microservice-ddd-cqrs-patterns/ddd-oriented-microservice.md](https://github.com/dotnet/docs/blob/main/docs/architecture/microservices/microservice-ddd-cqrs-patterns/ddd-oriented-microservice.md)
* Product: **dotnet-architecture**
* Technology: **microservices**
* GitHub Login: @nishanil
* Microsoft Alias: **nanil**
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.