dotnet / dotnet/csharpstandard
Review how we refer to "expressions that refer to nothing"
Open
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 815
- Forks
- 99
- Avg merge
- 1d 14h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 16
Description
Issue ECMA-TC49-TG2/spec#945 shows two places where it's currently described in terms of the few places that expressions can return nothing - but expression-bodied members (for constructors, void methods and property setters) should be included too. Rather than just add those to the list, we should consider a unifying concept.
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.