dotnet / dotnet/csharpstandard

Review how we refer to "expressions that refer to nothing"

Open
#47 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
C#
Stars
815
Forks
99
Avg merge
1d 14h
Merged PRs (30d)
16

Description

Issue ECMA-TC49-TG2/spec#945 shows two places where it's currently described in terms of the few places that expressions can return nothing - but expression-bodied members (for constructors, void methods and property setters) should be included too. Rather than just add those to the list, we should consider a unifying concept.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.