Proposal: record structs
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 12.7k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- Avg merge
- 11h 1m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
- [x] Proposal added: https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-10.0/record-structs.md
- [x] Discussed in LDM
- [x] Decision in LDM
- [x] Finalized: Done
- [ ] Spec'ed
Allow value type records with `record struct`.
Secondarily, we would also allow `record class` (with same meaning as `record`) and allow explicit declarations of positional members using different member kinds (`get/set` property, or field).
# References
- https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/master/proposals/csharp-9.0/records.md
- https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/master/spec/structs.md
- https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/master/meetings/2020/LDM-2020-05-04.md#structs-as-records
- https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/master/meetings/2020/LDM-2020-06-22.md#struct-records
- https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/master/meetings/2020/LDM-2020-09-30.md#struct-equality
- https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/master/meetings/2020/LDM-2020-10-05.md#record-struct-primary-constructor-defaults
https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/master/meetings/2020/LDM-2020-10-07.md#record-struct-syntax
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.