Consider ConfigureEmptyWebHost along with ConfigureSlimWebHost
Open
area-networking
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 38.4k
- Forks
- 10.9k
- Avg merge
- 2d 5h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 276
Description
I forgot about this public API. It is a little weird that the "empty" builder configures the "slim" web host.
As a follow up, would it make more sense to rename this to `ConfigureEmptyWebHost` and then add a `ConfigureSlimWebHost` that also calls `ConfigureWebDefaultsSlim` and adds Kestrel and the core routing services?
_Originally posted by @halter73 in https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/pull/49246#discussion_r1261534463_
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.