dotnet / dotnet/aspnetcore

SignalR support for webtransport

Open
#39,583 29 comments 17 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
area-networking area-signalr Blazor ♥ SignalR HTTP3 investigate
Dominant language
C#
Stars
38.4k
Forks
10.9k
Avg merge
2d 5h
Merged PRs (30d)
276

Description

### Is there an existing issue for this?

- [X] I have searched the existing issues

### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe the problem.

On the server side, do websockets create more mux overhead than UDP? If so, does this make a good argument for having Blazor support Webtransport? It appears Webtransport just went GA in Chrome a couple weeks ago? Does this mean Edge will follow soon?

https://developer.chrome.com/blog/new-in-chrome-97/#webtransport

### Describe the solution you'd like

In the same way client side websocket can be used in Blazor, I would also like to use Webtransport client side connections.

### Additional context

_No response_

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.