Block Editor: Pasted base64 (binary) images are silently dropped
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 970
- Forks
- 486
- Avg merge
- 3d 33m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 170
Description
Problem Statement
Pasting a binary / base64 image into the Block Editor (libs/new-block-editor) silently does nothing. Pasting an image referenced by URL works fine. There is no error, no warning, and no placeholder — the paste simply produces no image, so the author cannot tell whether the editor is broken or the clipboard was empty.
This happens whenever the clipboard holds a data:image/...;base64,... source rather than an http(s) URL — which is the normal result of copying an image out of Google Docs, Figma, Excel, a screenshot tool, or many web pages.
Root cause (verified)
core-web/libs/new-block-editor/src/lib/editor/extensions/nodes/image.extension.ts:132
parseHTML() {
return [
{ tag: 'figure img[src]' },
// Fallback: bare <img> tags from other sources / old content
{ tag: this.options.allowBase64 ? 'img[src]' : 'img[src]:not([src^="data:"])' }
];
}
allowBase64 is never configured, and @tiptap/extension-image defaults it to false. The :not([src^="data:"]) branch is therefore active, so ProseMirror's paste parser finds no matching rule for a data-URI <img> and discards the node with no feedback.
allowBase64 is a first-class option of the installed @tiptap/extension-image@3.22.2 — no backend work is required:
/**
* Controls if base64 images are allowed. Enable this if you want to allow
* base64 image urls in the `src` attribute.
* @default false
*/
allowBase64: boolean;
Reference: https://tiptap.dev/docs/editor/extensions/nodes/image#allowbase64
Known trade-off of this approach: enabling
allowBase64stores the full data URI inside the Block Editor field JSON rather than uploading the image as a dotCMS asset. Large pasted images will inflate the contentlet payload and the index document. Accepted deliberately to keep this a front-end-only configuration change; a follow-up ticket can add auto-upload of pasted binaries if payload size becomes a problem.
Browser & OS: not browser-specific — reproduced by the parse rule, independent of browser.
Steps to Reproduce
- Open any image in Google Docs, Figma, or a screenshot tool and copy it to the clipboard (this yields a base64 data URI, not a URL).
- Log in to the dotCMS admin and edit a contentlet that has a Block Editor field.
- Place the cursor in the Block Editor body.
- Paste (⌘V / Ctrl+V).
- Expected: the image is inserted into the document.
- Actual: nothing is inserted. No image, no error, no warning message.
- For contrast, copy an image from a web page via "Copy image address" and paste the resulting URL — that path works, confirming the failure is specific to base64 sources.
Acceptance Criteria
Happy path
- Pasting a
data:image/png;base64,…image into the Block Editor inserts a visible image at the cursor - Pasting a
data:image/jpeg;base64,…image inserts a visible image at the cursor - The inserted node is a
dotImagenode whosesrcholds the data URI - Saving the contentlet and reopening it renders the pasted image unchanged
Rendering parity
- A pasted base64 image renders through the VTL renderer (
dotImage.vtl) with the data URI intact insrc - A pasted base64 image renders through the React, Vue, and both Angular SDK block renderers with the data URI intact
-
TiptapHtmlserver-side HTML output preserves the data URI insrc
No regressions
- Pasting an
http(s)image URL still inserts an image, exactly as it does today - Images inserted from the dotCMS asset picker still carry their
dataattribute andlanguage_idquery param - Existing stored content renders unchanged
Editor interaction
- A pasted base64 image can be selected and its toolbar (align, wrap, edit properties) operates on it
- The image properties dialog opens on a pasted base64 image and shows the data URI in the Image URL field without truncating the stored value
Sad path
- Pasting clipboard content whose
srcis a malformed data URI inserts no node and logs no uncaught error - Pasting a non-image data URI (e.g.
data:text/html;base64,…) does not insert an image node
Tests
- Unit specs in
libs/new-block-editor/cover: base64 paste inserts a node, URL paste still works, and malformed data URIs are rejected
dotCMS Version
Latest from main (verified at commit 66bb905280).
Severity
Medium - Some functionality impacted
Links
- NA — no Freshdesk ticket. Found during Block Editor development.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start in core-web/libs/new-block-editor/src/lib/editor/extensions/nodes/image.extension.ts at parseHTML and inspect the allowBase64 option from @tiptap/extension-image. Add or update unit specs in libs/new-block-editor/ for base64, URL, and malformed data-URI pastes. Done means valid PNG and JPEG data URIs insert as dotImage nodes, existing URL and asset behavior remains intact, and the listed renderers preserve the URI.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- content, frontend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 72/100