dotCMS / dotCMS/core

[TASK] Phase 4: Monitoring, Metrics, and Iteration

Open
#34,660 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

dotCMS : Build stale Team : Enablement
Dominant language
Java
Stars
970
Forks
486
Avg merge
3d 33m
Merged PRs (30d)
170

Description

Description

Monitor the auto-remediation system effectiveness and iterate based on feedback:

  • Track diagnostic accuracy, issue quality, deduplication rate
  • Gather team feedback on categorization
  • Refine detection patterns based on false positives
  • Add workflow summary dashboard
  • Document lessons learned

This is Phase 4 of the Auto-Remediation EPIC (#34656).

Acceptance Criteria

  • Workflow summary displays key metrics (accuracy, deduplication, issue count)
  • Diagnostic accuracy measured: >80% target
  • Issue deduplication measured: <10% duplicates target
  • Team feedback collected via survey or Slack
  • False positive rate calculated: <10% target
  • Detection patterns refined based on real data
  • Weekly metrics report created for first month
  • Documentation updated with lessons learned

Priority

Medium

Additional Context

Key Metrics to Track:

  • Diagnostic accuracy (% correct root cause identification)
  • Issue deduplication rate
  • False positive rate
  • Time to diagnosis (should be <10 min)
  • Team satisfaction scores

Duration: 2-3 weeks of monitoring

Depends on: Phase 3 (#34659)

Related: Parent EPIC #34656

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing Phase 3 (#34659) and the parent EPIC (#34656) to identify the existing auto-remediation workflow and available metrics. Define how each acceptance criterion will be measured, then validate the dashboard, feedback collection, weekly reports, detection refinements, and lessons-learned documentation during the stated 2–3 week monitoring period.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
observability
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.