docker-library / docker-library/python
Consider adding git-lfs to the images
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Dockerfile
- Stars
- 2.8k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- Avg merge
- 3d 1h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Hi,
currently git is part of the images and a lot of people seem to use the images for ci/cd purposes and thus also git etc..
Now I found that in a lot of circumstances there were problems which ultimately boiled down to git-lfs not being available when people were using it.
Of course installing it in the ci/cd or or building an own image for those cases is possible too, however I would like to ask if it could be considered to install git-lfs per default in the image, as a service to all the people that use it (and often forget about it), I think it can prevent quite a few headaches in the feature...
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the Dockerfile definitions and image variants in the docker-library/python repository, then check how Git is currently installed and how image changes are validated. Determine which images should include git-lfs and verify the affected builds; done means the selected images provide git-lfs without breaking existing variants.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- dockerfile, git
- Domain
- devops, infrastructure
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100