Make type hints for `@dlt.source` / `@dlt.resource` decorated functions more prominent in the documentation
Open
documentation
needs confirmation
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 5.9k
- Forks
- 600
- Avg merge
- 1d 14h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 38
Description
### Documentation description
The correct type hints for a function decorated with `@dlt.source` or `@dlt.resource` are difficult to find in public facing docs. Finding a good example required a pretty deep dive into the code base.
I would expect a short section in the source docs, resource docs and cookbook example with a typed example, including import path and annotation.
This would help teams that adopt dlt and strict typing, prevent guesswork and quicken adoption.
### Are you a dlt user?
I'm considering using dlt, but the documentation is unclear.
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.