Make tests more concise without losing coverage
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Chore
Server
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 10
- Forks
- 5
- Avg merge
- 2h 41m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 66
Description
Some sort of macro-based thing? Or just extracting shared set up and success/failure response assertions for each route
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files or tests are named. Start by locating the route tests and comparing their shared setup with success and failure response assertions. Decide whether a macro or extracted helpers best removes repetition, then verify the refactor preserves the existing coverage and test behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- testing
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100