[BUG]: `@auth` rule not enforced properly for queries of type `...(filter: {id: ...}) {...}`
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 21.8k
- Forks
- 1.6k
- Avg merge
- 2d 5h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 9
Description
What version of Dgraph are you using?
I am using the free cloud tier, so this is the most I can do:
Built at 2021-05-28T22:00:10.859Z
Commit: 9debcc4
Commit Info: 9debcc4 Fri May 28 14:57:46 2021 -0700 (HEAD -> master, origin/master)
This is somewhere between 21.03.0 and 21.03.1
Tell us a little more about your go-environment?
...the cloud version...
Have you tried reproducing the issue with the latest release?
None
What is the hardware spec (RAM, CPU, OS)?
...again, the cloud version...
What steps will reproduce the bug?
For reference, this is a Stackoverflow question I created that has pretty much all info you would need in it: post. You add an @auth rule to the schema that looks like this: @auth(query: {rule: "query ($ID: [ID!]) {queryDevice(filter: {id: $ID}) {__typename} }"})...
Expected behavior and actual result.
...This uses the JWT claim ID and only lets the client access the entry corresponding to their own device. In theory. What actually happens is that the rule is not enforced. (I sure hope no one uses this feature in prod w/o testing). You are able to access the object as long as the precondition check (having the claim ID present in the JWT) is true. If you have one device's id -- or even gibberish for that matter -- inside this field, still, when querying using something like queryDevices {name} more than one result is returned.
Additional information
As Raphael noted on StackOverflow, using queries that don't depend on the id of an object work just fine.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the Stack Overflow reproduction linked in the issue and compare the @auth rule using filter: {id: $ID} with the working query forms described there. Trace the query authorization entry point for this rule and verify that a client can receive only the device matching the JWT ID, not multiple results or results for gibberish IDs.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- authorization, databases
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100