dfm / dfm/corner.py

citation bibtex is wrong??

Open
#117 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
576
Forks
234
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

This page https://joss.theoj.org/papers/960cad70e806f6fc9760888d64dc2c72 suggests that the volume is 1, issue is 2, and page / documentid is 24.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by comparing the citation metadata used for corner.py with the JOSS paper linked in the issue. Confirm whether the volume, issue, and page or document ID should be 1, 2, and 24, and consider the work complete when the generated BibTeX matches the paper's metadata.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
documentation
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.