RUSTSEC-2022-0034: Safety issues in `pkcs11`
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 204
- Forks
- 98
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Package | pkcs11 |
| Version | 0.5.0 |
| Warning | unsound |
| URL | https://github.com/mheese/rust-pkcs11/issues/57 |
| Patched Versions | n/a |
Impact
The interface of pkcs11 is subject to a number of safety issues, mainly related to handling of raw pointers. Despite presenting a safe interface, many of the functions and methods that rely on inputs which contain pointers (attributes and mechanisms in particular) can lead to segmentation faults and undefined behaviour when those pointers get dereferenced. For more details see the issues referenced below.
Other problems that have been identified by the community include use-after-free (mheese/rust-pkcs11#53) and unsound uses of transmute_copy (mheese/rust-pkcs11#55).
Workarounds
Users of the crate need to be extremely careful in all the calls made to avoid segmentation faults and undefined behaviour due to use of stale pointers. Whenever a pointer is derived from a value and passed to the library, that value's lifetime must be guaranteed to outlast all calls that rely on the pointer. For example, users should avoid creating or converting values within a separate scope (say, in a dedicated function), deriving a pointer, then extracting the pointer from that scope leaving the value to get dropped before passing the pointer to pkcs11.
References
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No repository file, test, or entry point is named. Start by locating the pkcs11 0.5.0 dependency and reviewing the referenced upstream issues (#38, #50, #53, #54, and #55); done requires determining a supported remediation despite no patched version being listed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- security
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100