devloperdevesh / devloperdevesh/FaultPlane
docs: improve contributor development guide
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 1
- Avg merge
- 14m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 57
Description
Problem
New contributors need clear guidance about project architecture, development workflow, and testing commands.
Proposed Solution
Improve contributor documentation.
Include:
- Local setup instructions
- Repository architecture overview
- Development commands
- Testing workflow
- Contribution process
Alternatives
Existing documentation can remain unchanged, but onboarding becomes harder for new contributors.
Use Case
Better documentation helps developers understand the project and submit quality contributions.
Additional Notes
Related files:
- CONTRIBUTING.md
- README.md
- docs/
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading CONTRIBUTING.md, README.md, and the contents of docs/ to identify gaps in local setup, architecture, development commands, testing workflow, and contribution guidance. Done means these areas are clearly documented for new contributors across the related files.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 65/100