developmentseed / developmentseed/tilebench
Issue 1
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 41
- Forks
- 3
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Internal block size for COG seems like an endless discussion.
Tilebench won't solve everything but with luck and nice reproducible process we will have a better understanding.


Blue - internal blocks
Red - Mercator grid
### Methods
Input project has quite an effect so we should make sure to test with several projection
Tools:
- https://github.com/developmentseed/morecantile
- https://github.com/geospatial-jeff/async-cog-reader (compute internal blocks shapes)
- GDAL / Rasterio
### Expected results
- Timings (S3 latency and data transfer)
- Number of GET Called
- Transfered byte
### Dataset
- Sentinel 2 - Int16 1band
- Naip - 3 bands Byte
Ref:
https://github.com/opendatacube/benchmark-rio-s3/blob/master/report.md
https://github.com/vincentsarago/rio-tiler-bench
https://github.com/vincentsarago/gdal-http2-benchmark
https://github.com/vincentsarago/awspds-benchmark
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start with Tilebench and the linked morecantile and async-cog-reader tools, then review the GDAL/Rasterio benchmarking references. Build a reproducible comparison across projections using Sentinel 2 and NAIP datasets; done means reporting S3 latency and transfer timings, GET request counts, and transferred bytes.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- aws, python
- Domain
- cloud, data, performance
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100