validate fiberloss fractions against imaging data
Open
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 5
- Forks
- 10
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Looking over #96 (and related code), I don't see where BGS-like targets are handled. Also, it looks like the fiberloss table is computed for just three "pure" astrophysical sources -- point source, EXP, and DEV.
We should do a more careful assessment of these assumptions -- and the resulting fiberloss fractions -- using the (DR7) imaging data.
Digging around some more, perhaps this issue instead belongs in desisim?
https://github.com/desihub/desisim/blob/master/py/desisim/simexp.py#L470-L548
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.