dense-analysis / dense-analysis/ale
Feature request: Type coverage for flow
- Dominant language
- Vim Script
- Stars
- 14k
- Forks
- 1.5k
- Avg merge
- 17h 49m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
It'd be great if ALE could indicate where flow has not inferred a type. This would help get to 100% type coverage.
Flow has great type inference, meaning that we can keep explicit annotations to a minimum.
But it'd be nice to see where it doesn't quite figure something out *in the editor*.
Currently, I use `flow-coverage-report` to find which files have uncovered expressions, and then `flow coverage --color $FILENAME` to see which expressions are uncovered. It's cumbersome.
There's already a vim plugin that does this: https://github.com/carlosrocha/vim-flow-plus, but I'd rather have ALE do it and not have to add yet another plugin.
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.