deepspeedai / deepspeedai/DeepSpeed
[QUESTION] How to run and aggregate validation during training?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 43.1k
- Forks
- 5k
- Avg merge
- 4d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 112
Description
I'm using Zero 3 for multi-gpu training. One thing I'm struggling with is how to periodically run validation during training? Related issue: https://github.com/microsoft/DeepSpeed/issues/1863
I've made several attempts, but none work as intended.
Attempt 1: use multi-gpu
Following a solution on how to run inference with multiple gpus (https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/issues/16616#issuecomment-1119253061), I tried this code:
ds_engine, _ = deepspeed.initialize(...)
for step, batch_data in enumerate(train_dataiter):
# do training stuff
# ......
if step % 100 == 0:
val_batch = next(val_dataiter)
rank = torch.distributed.get_rank()
val_batch_per_device = val_batch[rank*4:(rank+1)*4, ...] # assume each gpu process 4 input samples.
val_batch_per_device = val_batch_per_device.to(device=rank)
ds_engine.module.eval()
with torch.no_grad():
outputs = ds_engine.module(val_batch_per_device, return_dict=True)
ds_engine.module.train()
This way I can split the validation batch into chunks, and feed each gpu a different chunk. However, I don't know how to average the outputs from each gpu.
Attempt 2: use single gpu for validation
ds_engine, _ = deepspeed.initialize(...)
for step, batch_data in enumerate(train_dataiter):
# do training stuff
# ......
rank = torch.distributed.get_rank()
if step % 100 == 0 and rank == 0:
val_batch = next(val_dataiter)
val_batch = val_batch.to(device=rank)
ds_engine.module.eval()
with torch.no_grad():
outputs = ds_engine.module(val_batch, return_dict=True)
ds_engine.module.train()
In this case, I was hoping that all validation computation will happen at gpu 0, and all the other gpus will wait for validation to finish, then proceed to the next training iteration. However, this code will get stuck indefinitely at line outputs = ds_engine.module(val_batch, return_dict=True).
Attempt 3: just use deepspeed model engine
If model engine can do training, I can easily use the sam engine for inference right? Sadly no.
ds_engine, _ = deepspeed.initialize(...)
for step, batch_data in enumerate(train_dataiter):
# do training stuff
# ......
if step % 100 == 0:
rank = torch.distributed.get_rank()
ds_engine.module.eval()
val_batch = next(iter(val_dataloader))
val_batch = val_batch.to(device=rank)
val_loss = ds_engine(val_batch).loss
It turns our that by setting the model to eval mode (ds_engine.module.eval()), it will get CUDA OOM when running forward pass with the engine. If I avoid setting to eval mode, this code run with no problem. However, I still don't know how to average across gpus.
Attempt 4: use deepspeed inference engine
ds_engine, _ = deepspeed.initialize(...)
ds_inference_engine = deepspeed.init_inference(...)
for step, batch_data in enumerate(train_dataiter):
# do training stuff
# ......
rank = torch.distributed.get_rank()
if step % 100 == 0:
val_batch = next(iter(val_dataloader))
val_batch = val_batch.to(device=rank)
val_loss = ds_inference_engine(val_batch).loss
Again, in this case I don't know how to average val_loss across all gpus. Also, use ds_inference_engine together with ds_engine gives CUDA OOM error. I guess using two engines just take double the gpu memory?
Any guide on how to run validation with deepspeed? Thanks!
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the validation paths shown in the issue: deepspeed.initialize, ds_engine.module, and deepspeed.init_inference. Reproduce the four attempts with a minimal multi-GPU training run, then inspect the relevant DeepSpeed training and inference documentation or entry points. Done means the supported validation workflow, synchronization behavior, and loss aggregation method are documented with a working example.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python, pytorch
- Domain
- distributed-systems, machine-learning
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100