deepset-ai / deepset-ai/haystack-integrations
Clarify contribution terms for an external FXMacroData integration page
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Shell
- Stars
- 113
- Forks
- 215
- Avg merge
- 1d 14h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 14
Description
I maintain FXMacroData and have prepared an Apache-2.0 Haystack integration. It provides native pipeline components, Documents and agent tools, with public USD examples that need no API key.
Before contributing an original integrations/fxmacrodata.md page, could you clarify which licence governs contributions to this catalogue and whether its contributors must complete a CLA? I found the catalogue contribution instructions and the separate Haystack core CLA, but no licence or contributor agreement for this repository.
The proposed catalogue page would link to the externally maintained package and document installation and a runnable Pipeline example.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the catalogue contribution instructions and the separate Haystack core CLA referenced in the issue. Confirm which licence and contributor agreement apply to integrations/fxmacrodata.md; the issue is resolved when maintainers document those terms so the proposed page can be contributed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100