deepseek-ai / deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder-V2
Clarification on Code Implementation in DeepSeek vs Llama
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 7k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Dear Authors,
Thank you for providing such excellent work for the community to use!
I have a question regarding an implementation detail. In [Line 338](https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Base/blob/ea9b066cee82f82906fdd58898cb3788b1c5d770/modeling_deepseek.py#L338), it appears that the code is adapted from Llama. However, when looking closer, the implementation in DeepSeek seems to differ, particularly from [Line 363](https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Base/blob/main/modeling_deepseek.py#L363) to [Line 367](https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Base/blob/main/modeling_deepseek.py#L367), compared to Llama’s implementation in [Line 223](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/main/src/transformers/models/llama/modeling_llama.py#L223).
Could you explain the reasoning behind this difference? Were there specific considerations that led to this change?
I look forward to your response. Thank you again for your great work!
Best regards,
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.